We are sad to announce the death of Shirley Williams aged 90. Baroness Williams of Cosby was a founder member of the SDP, and following that party's merger with the Liberal party, a leading member of the Liberal Democrats. We extend our deepest condolences to Lady Williams' family.
Farmers are facing a triple whammy.
Firstly, forty per cent of our lamb goes to the European Union (EU) along with large exports of wheat and beef. Even with the thin deal we have with the EU, farmers are now at a commercial disadvantage due to administrative costs.
Secondly, Trump massively increased support to American farmers. Because of this and their less stringent rules regarding production, the US can easily undercut British farmers (who will need to maintain high standards in a UK-EU deal) and we could end up importing low standard foodstuffs.
Thirdly, as if that was not enough, the government plans to phase out agricultural support and this will be reduced to zero by 2028, just seven years away. Anything between 60-80 per cent of a farmer’s profits come now from Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) payments.
In future they will receive environmental management payments instead.
In an average year, a 200-300 acre farm would only make a £6-7,000 a year profit without government support. Many farmers are diversifying to try and make a living. So, they take in lodgers, do bed and breakfast and similar schemes.
It will get to the point that one farmer will need between 1,200 -1,500 acres to make any sort of living from farming alone. At this rate we could end up with mega farms or zero farms. Anything marginal will go. However, it’s hard to scale up and create bigger farms due to our historic framework of higgledy-piggledy villages and roads.
We might think that the government is throwing farmers a lifeline by letting them do environmental improvement work under the new government Environmental Land Management proposals. However, farmers will not be able to make any money out of it, such is the nature of the scheme.
The future for our farmers looks very bleak indeed.
The Loughborough and Charnwood Liberal Democrats join with the rest of the country in expressing our condolences to Her Majesty the Queen and her family at the passing of His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh. This is the party's leader, Ed Davy's, official statement on behalf of the Liberal Democrats.
Check out what Lib Dems are doing around the country to make their local area better.
Lib Dem Heroes
Our candidate in Loughborough South West, Aidan Reed, discusses the issues the County Council must address.Link
The UK Government, during January 2021, issued a White Paper entitled “Skills for Jobs: Lifelong Learning for Opportunity and Growth” but I have no confidence in the ability of our government to competently manage a topic which is so important for the future of UK residents. Why do I lack confidence in our government?
There are several reasons:
- Our Prime Minister and his ‘Vote Leave’ Government have minimal practical experience of managing or developing scientific research, construction, teaching, medical care, engineering, national health, businesses, economics, data science, technical education, finance, exporting and other essential skills.
- The majority of the Cabinet are career politicians without experience of real-life situations.
- The White Paper refers to “Learning”. We need highly skilled people who can think - not merely learn by rote.
I remember several examples of serious mistakes which were made by previous UK governments because they were not in touch with practical reality.
At the end of World War 2, the UK government wanted to attract large employers such as Ford and English Electric to Liverpool where many youngsters were unemployed. Therefore, it provided large factory premises at attractive rates. It had not considered the availability of suitable recruits. In Stafford, the home of English Electric, most youngsters had grown up with fathers and uncles who worked on factory floors. In Liverpool, few youngsters knew what pliers were for. Training courses, as in Africa, had to commence with basic skills.
During the 1960s, the UK Government introduced a levy/grant system for training of apprentices.
For a few years employers trained more apprentices than they had in previous years. Then the government realised that the fund was seriously overdrawn. They increased the levy and reduced grants. Employers stopped training
Tony Blair encouraged schools to send leavers to university by providing extra funds to schools for sixth forms. Traditionally the brightest 5% of school leavers went to university and apprentices were selected from the next 15% in the suitability spectrum. Many of these became highly competent skilled and experienced employees who could be supervisors and trainers. Suddenly they became unavailable as up to 50% of leavers went to university. The recruits for apprentices were not suitable for traditional apprenticeships.
The availability of highly skilled staff for Supervision and Training was not a problem for most of the 20th century. As skilled technicians aged, they preferred jobs which were less physically demanding. However, the ongoing reduction in the number of suitable apprentices created a lack of suitable supervisors and trainers. Many have been recruited from abroad. Now many of these have been driven home by Brexit.
The Boris Johnson Government is in chaos with its education management. Its argument that vulnerable children would have mental problems if they could not go to school ignored the fact that most of them would suffer even if they went to school because their home conditions and facilities were inadequate. It had failed to deliver its promises to provide adequate internet facilities and to ensure that vulnerable children received food and care. It ignored the difficulty that schools would have in ensuring that teachers and pupils could rescue the situation after being given minimal warning.
The government has failed to deal with the shortage of experienced and trained hospital staff, the large increase in unemployment, students who used to be supported by the Erasmus scheme, lack of re-training for people made redundant, the Brexit departure of EU highly skilled staff and inadequate Covid testing for students and teachers.
Our ancestors protected us and cared for us during two World Wars and the aftermath. We must do the same for our children and future generations. Liberal Democrats must provide the leadership which seems to be lacking elsewhere.
Source information from:
London School of Economics
I am lucky because I and my family have been extremely fortunate to have been born in the twentieth century, to have been born in western Europe, and to have been able to enjoy the economic and other benefits of living in the European Union.
My hope, for most of my life, has been for Europe, North America and like-minded countries to work together for the benefit of the human race and to lead the world in maintaining liberal and democratic standards. The results have not been perfect, but there have been wonderful benefits during the last 40 years - no wars between EU states, increased security by co-operation and shared funding, huge improvements in living standards, free-movement of staff, Erasmus support for students, etc. Now, after the last minute and incomplete Brexit trade deal, it will need a huge effort by the British people to maintain the quality of life provided by our ancestors.
Millions of Europeans (along with many others across the world) died during two world wars and more millions suffered great hardship during the following years. Those of us who were born during the last century benefitted hugely from the magnificent sacrifices of our ancestors and the efforts of those who inspired and built the EU. Surely, we have a moral duty to pass those benefits onto future generations. They should not be frittered away by a selfish and/or incompetent group of politicians. They were elected to serve the people - not just themselves and their outdated beliefs.
We need to elect parliamentarians who have practical experience of managing or developing scientific research, construction, teaching, medical care, engineering, national health, businesses, economics, data science, technical education, finance, exporting and other essential skills. We need a Government Cabinet which is not dominated by incompetent journalists, traditionalists and career politicians who owe their positions to egoistical leaders. Government is much more than the manipulation of words and the wasteful use of taxpayers’ money. It should not expect that it will be rescued by the General Public and the workers and managers of organisations which generate the wealth of the UK and provide the essential services. (Dealing with the effects of a major Trade Deal with only a few days notice of essential actions over Christmas and New Year, or completely re-organising schooling with 24 hours notice, or operating a complex business when necessary decisions have been delayed or reversed).
The residents of the UK are facing many challenges - such as care for an ageing population, education for those who have suffered this century, the possible break-up of the UK, the departure of skilled and essential immigrant and non-immigrant workers, the maintenance of a wonderful health service, etc. However, four massive challenges have to be overcome in order for the others to be dealt with. They are the Coronavirus Pandemic, Brexit & the Economy, Climate Change & Education.
In trying to tackle these challenges the UK electorate will soon see that they have been misled by the members of an incompetent and indecisive government who believe that they have been appointed so that they will be remembered for posterity. They are more likely to be despised because they followed false dogma and caused our country to become a laughingstock. Any Cabinet leading us at this time must include people who have real experience of making responsible and rational decisions. The government repeatedly say that they are “following the science”. Yes, they are - but many weeks after they should have acted to save lives and jobs.
We can see the ongoing self-destruction of the Labour Party and the current destruction of the Conservative Party by Johnson ‘The Ditherer’. This destruction is already in progress according to a new poll which is the first detailed survey of the public’s perception of Johnson’s handling of the recently concluded Brexit talks and the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 22,000 people were surveyed in the Focaldata poll in December and results published by the Sunday Times. The poll found the ruling Conservatives would lose 81 seats, wiping out their 80-seat majority. The Scottish National Party was also predicted to win 57 of the 59 seats in Scotland. Installing Liberal Democrat MPs instead, would bring a responsible stabilising influence in any future government.
Our forebears protected us and cared for us during two World Wars and in the aftermath. We must do the same for our children and future generations. Liberal Democrats can provide the leadership which is lacking elsewhere.
Source information from:
- Imperial College
- The Economist
- London School of Economics
- The Guardian